|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)
On 19/02/2010 19:23, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, but my point is it doesn't appear to be running idle vcpu as
> indicated by regs->rsp and regs->rip. They both point to dom0 context.
> This from printk in ns16550_interrupt().
>
> To rephrase the question, if regs->rip and regs->rsp show guest context
> in do_IRQ(), then current must always point to guest vcpu, correct?
Oh, so the serial interrupt interrupted a guest's execution? Then yes,
current should point at that guest.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu),
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|