|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)
 
On 19/02/2010 19:23, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, but my point is it doesn't appear to be running idle vcpu as
> indicated by regs->rsp and regs->rip. They both point to dom0 context.
> This from printk in ns16550_interrupt().
> 
> To rephrase the question, if regs->rip and regs->rsp show guest context
> in do_IRQ(), then current must always point to guest vcpu, correct?
Oh, so the serial interrupt interrupted a guest's execution? Then yes,
current should point at that guest.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu),
Keir Fraser <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Mukesh Rathor
 - Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu), Keir Fraser
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |