WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Q on ioctl support in netfront/netback

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Q on ioctl support in netfront/netback
From: ravi kerur <rkerur@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:00:53 -0800
Cc: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:03:15 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U7pep8u9+unWa1QwzQywa1vx9NLMCz6fiWzKvZMRVtA=; b=IdyOjzCUUfUz4AYVDYW4Vhp6ZApvuQwjx3mD5snttBW31RzzMUnrYlHGmib+TtYAEs aNC8hxma82FXtXTdWsN96PnRkRigcZfoZN1UX5yZ3VV+Hy92gFktE6roSp9BWhHDEHUv hj4ce65gQCPXqwRlHPf2/QWAZGbT2Rmfdu6J4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=u99LFcMDOh9F09Jg53kFASgFYFoH/BokO0aDcM8a1VvUZDng8ZBTyIz7Td7xA/w6rp Km7d/4K0fC0NbEC7OjmUXHEk7XKqhrnPaVNyDYPMTeEhQxGWq1uymIOHs+DeraRekCbw otaxKbsIG+gdx+FFtM5HzMrZQUXAk8zjlfV1I=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100217164045.GA18387@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <dfc283f41002141823o7ca47994g7530e5cfc6ef7ad6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B791671.4050902@xxxxxxxxxx> <dfc283f41002150754w333813a4g15969fe418cba102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100216181454.GD21067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dfc283f41002170819m7f150ba7s6729de4820fa238e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100217164045.GA18387@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Konrad, Pasi

Thanks for your inputs. Looks like we(our team) needs to take a step back and evaluate this and other things we have discovered in the past few days. We will get back to you with more questions.

Thanks
-RK

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 08:19:14AM -0800, ravi kerur wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> Using PCI passthrough(I believe it is via config file changes) prevents
> other domU's accessing the NIC correct? If I use it, would the network

That is correct.

> transmit/receive still happen via netfront/netback drivers?

If you have two NICs, where one of them is PCI passthrough and
the other dedicated to the guests, then the second can serve as
netback/netfront.

Thought I wonder if you can have the netback in the guest. This
way you could fiddle with your registers in one domain, and export
a network interface (vif) to the other guests from the domain that
owns the PCI device.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel