|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC
|
To: |
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:37:55 +0000 |
|
Cc: |
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx" <kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Peace <Andrew.Peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:38:29 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<78c49794-4454-4c3b-80a6-72efcbc73fb3@default> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcquV5MBbrdaVWi9TpaiPXOXdQj3/QABaZJ3 |
|
Thread-topic: |
Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001 |
On 15/02/2010 15:55, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Other than the above, can you (or Jan? or others?) think of
> other cases where it won't work in practice? If not, it's
> at least worth a try to see if Jan's test cases continue
> to see a problem.
I think that's the only obvious one.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
|
|
|
Home