xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC
To: |
dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC |
From: |
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:07:43 -0800 (PST) |
Cc: |
Ian, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Grzegorz Milos <gm281@xxxxxxxxx>, Peace <Andrew.Peace@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:09:53 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<dd8af362-e0b4-4ad7-9a44-5960e2563e7c@default> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<dd8af362-e0b4-4ad7-9a44-5960e2563e7c@default> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
> Simply, avail_heap_pages would fail if total_avail_pages
> is less than 1%(?) of the total memory on the system AND
> the request is order==0. Essentially, this is reserving
> a "zone" for order>0 allocations.
Avoid worst fragmentation issues by reserving a "zone"
of physical memory only for order>0 allocations.
Signed-off-by: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
g`"--- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c Fri Feb 12 09:24:18 2010 +0000
+++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c Fri Feb 12 11:05:19 2010 -0700
@@ -223,6 +223,10 @@ static heap_by_zone_and_order_t *_heap[M
static unsigned long *avail[MAX_NUMNODES];
static long total_avail_pages;
+static long max_total_avail_pages; /* highwater mark */
+#define ORDER_NONZERO_FRAC 128
+static long order_nonzero_zonesize; /* reserved for order>0 allocations */
+
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(heap_lock);
@@ -304,6 +308,13 @@ static struct page_info *alloc_heap_page
spin_lock(&heap_lock);
/*
+ When available memory is scarce, allow only larger allocations
+ to avoid worst of fragmentation issues
+ */
+ if ( !order && (total_avail_pages <= order_nonzero_zonesize) )
+ goto fail;
+
+ /*
* Start with requested node, but exhaust all node memory in requested
* zone before failing, only calc new node value if we fail to find memory
* in target node, this avoids needless computation on fast-path.
@@ -337,6 +348,7 @@ static struct page_info *alloc_heap_page
}
/* No suitable memory blocks. Fail the request. */
+fail:
spin_unlock(&heap_lock);
return NULL;
@@ -503,6 +515,11 @@ static void free_heap_pages(
avail[node][zone] += 1 << order;
total_avail_pages += 1 << order;
+ if ( total_avail_pages > max_total_avail_pages )
+ {
+ max_total_avail_pages = total_avail_pages;
+ order_nonzero_zonesize = max_total_avail_pages / ORDER_NONZERO_FRAC;
+ }
/* Merge chunks as far as possible. */
while ( order < MAX_ORDER )
nonzero_alloc.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC,
Dan Magenheimer <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] RE: Tmem vs order>0 allocation, workaround RFC, Dan Magenheimer
|
|
|