On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:22:13PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk (konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > Before this patch, if you specified 'swiotlb=force,1024' it would
> > ignore both arguments. This fixes it and allows the user specify it
> > in any order (or none at all).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Having only one substring of digits makes allowing arbitrary order
> less useful if more options get added (as in foo,bar,1024,baz,force
> would make more sense as foo,bar,nslabs=1024,baz,force). Do you
> think this one is really needed? If so, be useful to update
I got caught a couple of times where I needed to provide both arguments
and could not figure out why it did not work. Switching the arguments
around fixed it. Thought that it might make sense to remove this
potential trap from other folks by this patch.
Your point about more options got me thinking about the overflow buffer.
I could also provide an over-ride for that, maybe:
"swiotlb=force,overflow=32,slabs=1024"
(Not sure about the syntax?)
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt which is slightly out of date now.
Oh, good catch. Will roll the patch for that file as well.
>
> thanks,
> -chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home