Hi Sander,
For option1 "cpufreq=dom0-kernel", it is not working currently, the reason is a
bit complex, and let me explain. For every processor, there is corresponding
acpi processor object in ACPI DSDT table. Kernel use struct acpi_processor to
represent the acpi processor object. There is a field "id" in acpi_processor
representing the cpu id (the same id as smp_processor_id()). Kernel cpufreq use
acpi_processor->id to do the frequency scaling. Unfortunately, in pv_ops
domain0, the acpi_processor->id value is not correct, because it is get by
acpi_id->apic_id->id mapping, and in pv_ops dom0, the apic_id of vcpu is not
correctly initialized. Please see drivers/acpi/processor_core.c:get_cpu_id()
for detail code, where cpu_physical_id() is not initialized in pv_ops dom0
case. I am still thinking if there is better approach to do the
acpi_id->apic_id->id mapping in pv_ops dom0 case.
BTW, "cpufreq=dom0-kernel" is not recommend, due to that it require
#pCPU=#vCPU, and all vCPU in dom0 must be pined.
For option2 "cpufreq=xen", from the log, Xen can get all the P states info, but
it failed to do cpufreq cpu initialization
(xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c: cpufreq_cpu_init()), so the cpufreq is
not started finally, and xenpm cannot set cpufreq parameter. To get more debug
info, I write a simple patch as attached, could you please have a try and send
the debug info?
Another thing is, does "cpufreq=xen" work with linux-2.6.18-xen dom0?
Best Regards
Ke
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sander Eikelenboom
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 11:08 PM
To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] [xen 3.4.2][2.6.31.6-pvops] Problems with cpufreq=xen
power management on amd k8 cpu
Hi All,
I'm trying to get powermanagement working with xen and a 2.6.31.6-pvops kernel
on xen 3.4.2
>From what I have read, I have 2 options:
1) Let the xen hypervisor do the powermanagement (cpufreq=xen)
2) Let the dom0 kernel do the powermanagement (cpufreq=dom0-kernel)
When booting the 2.6.31.6-pvops kernel on bare metal without hypervisor the
powernow-k8 module works.
When booting the 2.6.31.6-pvops kernel as dom0 on the xen 3.4.2 hypervisor the
powernow-k8 module doesn't load and complains:
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.797914] powernow-k8: Found 1 AMD
Athlon(tm) Dual Core Processor 4850e processors (2 cpu cores) (version 2.20.00)
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.797926] powernow-k8: register
performance failed: bad ACPI data
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.797929] [Firmware Bug]:
powernow-k8: No compatible ACPI _PSS objects found.
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.797931] [Firmware Bug]:
powernow-k8: Try again with latest BIOS.
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.797941] powernow-k8: register
performance failed: bad ACPI data
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.822315] acpi-cpufreq:
acpi_cpufreq_init
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.822319] acpi-cpufreq:
acpi_cpufreq_early_init
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.822333] acpi-cpufreq:
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init
Jan 7 15:25:37 localhost kernel: [ 12.822338] acpi-cpufreq:
acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init
It could be that additional changes are needed to the pvops kernel that have
been made to the xen 2.6.18.8 kernel ?
When trying the first option, and let the hypervisor do the powermanagement
(booting with cpufreq=xen cpufreq.debug=2 loglvl=all)
it shows the following in xm dmesg (complete xm dmesg attachted):
(XEN) Set CPU acpi_id(0) cpuid(0) Px State info:
(XEN) _PPC: 0
(XEN) Set CPU acpi_id(0) cpuid(0) Px State info:
(XEN) _PCT: descriptor=130, length=12, space_id=127, bit_width=0,
bit_offset=0, reserved=0, address=0
(XEN) _PCT: descriptor=130, length=12, space_id=127, bit_width=0,
bit_offset=0, reserved=0, address=0
(XEN) _PSS: state_count=6
(XEN) State0: 2500MHz 50000mW 100us 9us 0xe8201391 0x391
(XEN) State1: 2400MHz 46020mW 100us 9us 0xe82013d0 0x3d0
(XEN) State2: 2200MHz 38671mW 100us 9us 0xe820144e 0x44e
(XEN) State3: 2000MHz 32100mW 100us 9us 0xe82014cc 0x4cc
(XEN) State4: 1800MHz 26265mW 100us 9us 0xe820154a 0x54a
(XEN) State5: 1000MHz 13888mW 100us 9us 0xe8201582 0x582
(XEN) _PSD: num_entries=5 rev=0 domain=0 coord_type=253 num_processors=2
(XEN) _PPC: 0
(XEN) Set CPU acpi_id(1) cpuid(1) Px State info:
(XEN) _PPC: 0
(XEN) Set CPU acpi_id(1) cpuid(1) Px State info:
(XEN) _PCT: descriptor=130, length=12, space_id=127, bit_width=0,
bit_offset=0, reserved=0, address=0
(XEN) _PCT: descriptor=130, length=12, space_id=127, bit_width=0,
bit_offset=0, reserved=0, address=0
(XEN) _PSS: state_count=6
(XEN) State0: 2500MHz 50000mW 100us 9us 0xe8201391 0x391
(XEN) State1: 2400MHz 46020mW 100us 9us 0xe82013d0 0x3d0
(XEN) State2: 2200MHz 38671mW 100us 9us 0xe820144e 0x44e
(XEN) State3: 2000MHz 32100mW 100us 9us 0xe82014cc 0x4cc
(XEN) State4: 1800MHz 26265mW 100us 9us 0xe820154a 0x54a
(XEN) State5: 1000MHz 13888mW 100us 9us 0xe8201582 0x582
(XEN) _PSD: num_entries=5 rev=0 domain=0 coord_type=253 num_processors=2
(XEN) _PPC: 0
So it seems to find all available powerstates, but using xenpm doesn't seem to
work:
serveerstertje:~# xenpm get-cpu-topology
CPU core socket
CPU0 0 0
CPU1 1 0
serveerstertje:~# xenpm set-scaling-governor userspace
[CPU0] failed to set governor name
[CPU1] failed to set governor name
serveerstertje:~# xenpm set-scaling-governor ondemand
[CPU0] failed to set governor name
[CPU1] failed to set governor name
serveerstertje:~# xenpm set-scaling-governor performance
[CPU0] failed to set governor name
[CPU1] failed to set governor name
serveerstertje:~# xenpm set-scaling-governor powersave
[CPU0] failed to set governor name
[CPU1] failed to set governor name
serveerstertje:~# xenpm get-cpufreq-para
[CPU0] failed to get cpufreq parameter
[CPU1] failed to get cpufreq parameter
--
Best regards,
Sander mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cpufreq.patch
Description: cpufreq.patch
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home