|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: A question about changeset 20621:f9392f6eda79 and Di
On 06/01/2010 09:46, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Yes, I think actually that would be a bug fix, given how tools currently use
>>> the nr_nodes field. Feel free to send a patch as part of your fix-up work: I
>>> don't think even changing the field name is necessary, but we can add a
>>> comemnt to sysctl.h.
>>
>> Actually I think we should change the nr_cpus field in the same way, and may
>> as well change their names to max_cpu_id and max_node_id. I'll look into
>> this myself.
>
> Why we need change the nr_cpus? It has max_cpu_id already.
> Thanks that you will look into this.
Yes, true. So I only changed nr_nodes field. I checked in a patch as c/s
20762. I didn't change any Python code -- just up as far as the Python C
extension.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|