|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen_tlb_flush_all mfn validation panic
On 24/12/2009 15:32, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 24/12/2009 15:06, "Kieran Mansley" <kmansley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The initial "bad gmfn" message seems to be due to an attempt to validate
>> the mfn argument to the mmuext_op. It's not surprising to me that this
>> fails as xen_tlb_flush_all doesn't supply an mfn argument - it's not
>> needed for the MMUEXT_TLB_FLUSH_ALL command. Is there something that is
>> supposed to mean that the mfn argument should be valid even when not
>> explicitly set by the caller, or is the validation of the mfn for all
>> mmuext_op commands a bug?
>
> The explicit check for INVALID_MFN is new, and that is obviously a bug. I
> will sort out a suitable fix for this.
Should be fixed by c/s 20723.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|