[Xen-devel] Re: is_xen_swiotlb_buffer() vs CONFIG_HIGHMEM

>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> 15.12.09 19:34 >>>
>On 12/14/2009 07:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> shouldn't is_xen_swiotlb_buffer() also check against e.g. highstart_pfn
>> to deal with wrap-around potentially leading to aliasing of
>> [xen_io_tlb_start,xen_io_tlb_end)?
>>    
>
>So what you're saying is that if the pfn is for a high page, then 
>"__va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT);" is simply invalid.  The resulting addr is 
>undefined, and may end up erroneously aliasing with the xen tlb buffer.
>
>Do I understand your concern properly?

Yes.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] is_xen_swiotlb_buffer() vs CONFIG_HIGHMEM, Jan Beulich [Xen-devel] Re: is_xen_swiotlb_buffer() vs CONFIG_HIGHMEM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge [Xen-devel] Re: is_xen_swiotlb_buffer() vs CONFIG_HIGHMEM, Jan Beulich <=

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] Re: Live migration fails due to c/s 20627, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen.org Announces Xen Cloud Platform 0.1, p z

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: is_xen_swiotlb_buffer() vs CONFIG_HIGHMEM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Problems with audio device pass-through with the latest xen-unstable, Tom Rotenberg

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]