Re: [Xen-devel] Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel

To:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:48:30 -0800
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Wright <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2009 07:49:29 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C73EBE43.3A98%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<C73EBE43.3A98%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091125 Fedora/3.0-3.12.rc1.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0

On 12/04/09 05:25, Keir Fraser wrote:

4.0 should release in January, and pv_ops should be fine for dom0 and domU
use at that time. Possibly we will need a 'very stable' branch in the pv_ops
tree so that we can really get things stabilised at the same time as the
xen-unstable tree.

Yes. I'll probably just follow the mainline stable kernel pattern (ie,maintain stable-2.6.x for as long as the upstream stable-2.6.x ismaintained).


    J


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel