WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel

To: Anthony Wright <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:25:23 +0000
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 05:25:51 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B18F92E.70305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acp02Rbzb1RxOE4oSTyXmw3gI9vC1QADCSp1
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Production Use of the PV OPS Kernel
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001
On 04/12/2009 11:57, "Anthony Wright" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I understand that 3.5 is using pv-ops as the default kernel, and assumed
> that there would be a production version declared when 3.5 is released.
> Is that likely to be the case, and if so is there any clearer view on
> when 3.5 will be released? The only reference that I can find to a
> release date was a mailing list post in July saying 'End of the calendar
> year, roughly' and I wondered if things are still on track for that.

4.0 should release in January, and pv_ops should be fine for dom0 and domU
use at that time. Possibly we will need a 'very stable' branch in the pv_ops
tree so that we can really get things stabilised at the same time as the
xen-unstable tree.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>