Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384

To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:39:39 +0000
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 02 Nov 2009 13:40:03 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4AEF4A54.2030806@xxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcpcAKgG+F3WH+M5QEudyKjrJNRM3wABFK60
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] c/s 20384
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

On 02/11/2009 21:08, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> What's the real changeset id you're referring to?  The small-integer
> numbers are only locally valid (and globally by coincidence), and 20384
> here doesn't seem at all relevant to your points.
> 
> I you're referring to f74f0c1ae8ab, which is  21773 in my tree...

Yes, that's the one.

 K.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] c/s 20384, Jan Beulich [Xen-devel] Re: c/s 20384, Keir Fraser Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384, Jeremy Fitzhardinge Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384, Keir Fraser <= Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384, Jan Beulich Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384, Jeremy Fitzhardinge

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] c/s 20384