WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] hypervisor memory usage

To: Vladimir Zidar <mr_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] hypervisor memory usage
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:12:51 +0200
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 06:13:15 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AE832C6.8090309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C70DD036.18A90%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE828A4.4080601@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091028115800.GA1434@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4AE832C6.8090309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:02:14PM +0100, Vladimir Zidar wrote:
> Sounds possible. However it would be great if there was switch to 
> disable that feature in case hardware is not capable of VT-d, as I'd 
> rather use those 300mb than have software support for something that I 
> can't actually use.
> 
> Thanks for hints, you were very helpful.
> 
> I'll dig more into rhel/centos xen sources to look for any reference to 
> vt-d.
> 

It could also be some other feature/change..

Maybe this helps: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html

(there's the changelog in the end).

-- Pasi

> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >> I understand that this could be due to rhel patches, and maybe 
> >>doesn't relate to official xen builds, but I'd like to know if this 
> >>issue was known or not before jumping into xen 3.4 - as it won't be 
> >>direct rpm/yum upgrade path.
> >>
> >>    
> >
> >RHEL 5.4 (-164 kernel) added more support for VT-d etc, so maybe that's why
> >more DMA memory is reserved. dunno.
> >
> >-- Pasi
> >  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel