WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 00:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:26:05 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1252308333; bh=pp3CFE1LUK7WNSXVx8xh3n/dTamBFgtsx2l6Rb7G8g4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ki/2z3dEuXAu95YBNCtzxVNcbY8+o8T5DP7dKUbThplWgieM4Tpc/5t2h49HwbwMV3tHGWGMRb4ZbIu2GKVn/9bSsY8nKkho33m0v/a2yi3dOpxdEH03liZ7CkwqqbVcOJ1dVfjHHf0DuYyHJOd5X4vPR6PpdDqgo7ne/4c/zno=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4EtDrQIMnb7tDgHttHnNX19r0MYpFnmNUDstEA70j2rr3C0ZLotuVENWXSWelVAZyYrdVVd0DGVHoMwh/CY8g8rpJDvl2N0zPLyP0zM9MWZnkfmTCE8g3B5+mm15c8u54jmETlcCth2RBZIPZxmGIFrkFAzvn4F2JeFbyjwu024=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090907065759.GZ31123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pasi,

I was trying to load the most recent 2.6.31-rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 ( via src.rpm) on F12
rawhide and got stack trace. Jeremy is saying that rc8 works ok under Xen Unstable.
But, Libvirt 0.7.0-6 would obviously have dependencies  on xen-3.4.1 packages.
If i will port Xen 3.5 directly to F12 (F11) it might work with rc8, however Libvirt 0.7.0-6 will be most probably lost again. Libvirt 0.7.0-6 has been built for 3.4.1 Hypervisor ( in my understanding) . That's why i wrote if Xen 3.5 can load rc8, the easiest way to fix
issue is to backport required Xen 3.5 CSs to xen-3.4.1-X(?).src.rpm  and get it resolved before F12 November's release.

Boris

--- On Mon, 9/7/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:

From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 2:57 AM

On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 09:49:41PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> As far as Xen 3.5 tarball will be officially released  kernel supporting Dom0 should be
> JF's pvops kernel. When  xen-3.5.0-X.src.rpm and updated libvirt ( next preview)
> will become available via F13 rawhide , F12 & F13 rawhide would be ready to go
> in text mode as 3.5 Xen Hosts with virt-install&virt-manager available via VNC
> connections.  Why wait until Upstream merge ?
>

Uhm.. sorry I'm a bit confused. If I understood correctly you have a
call trace on your pv_ops dom0 kernel?

Does that only happen with Xen 3.4.1 or what's the problem?

-- Pasi

> Boris
>
> --- On Sun, 9/6/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8
> To: "Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" <enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx, "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 2:37 PM
>
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 01:10:14AM +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> > On 09/07/2009 01:04 AM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > >I believe, that some set of CSs from Xen 3.5 has to be included as
> > >patches into
> > >xen-3.4.1-3.src.rpm, in case if it causes by 3.4.1 Hypervisor.
> > >Otherwise  , F12 release in November won't have suitable Dom0 kernel
> > >again.
> > >I would guess 2.6.31-rc6 at best.
> > >
> > >Boris.
> > >
> > >--- On *Sun, 9/6/09, Boris Derzhavets /<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >    From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >    Subject: [Fedora-xen] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Errors when build 2.6.31-rc8
> > >    To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> > >    Cc: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
> > >    Date: Sunday, September 6, 2009, 12:56 PM
> > >
> > >    Attempt to load 2.6-31-rc8 under Xen 3.4.1 , installed via
> > >    xen-3.4.1-3.src.rpm along with
> > >    libvirt(rawhide) , on top F12 rawhide. yum update gcc,glibc,kernel
> > >    had been run.
> > >
> > >    Call trace:
> > >
> > >    usb_hc_died + .....
> > >    usb_add_hcd +.....
> > >    usb_hcd_pci_probe + ....
> > >    do_work_for_cpu + .....
> > >    local_pci_probe + ...
> > >    do_work_for_cpu +.....
> > >    kthread +.....
> > >    child_rip+....
> > >    restore_args + .....
> > >    child_rip + .....
> > >    Code : .   .   .   .
> > >    .  .  .   .
> > >
> > >    RIP [<ffff...c7>] usb_kick_khubd + 0x10/0x25
> > >    RSP < ffff ... e0>
> > >    CR2: 00000...098
> > >
> > >    ---[ end trace 8219......]----
> > >
> > >    uhci_hcd 0000:00:1a:0 host controller process error, something bad
> > >    happened !
> > >    uhci_hcd 0000:00:1a:0 host controller halted , very bad
> > >    uhci_hcd 0000:00:1a:0  HC died, cleaning up
> > >
> > >    2.6.31-rc6 loads fine in same environment under Xen 3.4.1 on top
> > >    of  F12 rawhide
> > >
> > >    Boris,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >   
> > I thought Fedora will no longer have dom 0 kernel?
> >
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0
>
> "Dom0 status: awaiting upstream kernel support"
>
> -- Pasi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
>       

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel