|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion
To: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion |
From: |
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:14:05 +0200 |
Cc: |
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>, Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:14:35 -0700 |
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ts.fujitsu.com; i=juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; q=dns/txt; s=s1536b; t=1248847976; x=1280383976; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Juergen=20Gross=20<juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |Subject:=20Re:=20[Xen-devel]=20Cpu=20pools=20discussion |Date:=20Wed,=2029=20Jul=202009=2008:14:05=20+0200 |Message-ID:=20<4A6FE8AD.3020308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|To:=20Ke ir=20Fraser=20<keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|CC:=20George=20 Dunlap=20<dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>,=20=0D=0A=20Tim=20Deegan=20< Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,=0D=0A=20Zhigang=20Wang=20<zhig ang.x.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>,=20=0D=0A=20"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx urce.com"=20<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|MIME-Version: =201.0|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20< C694C1D6.10B73%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>|References:=20< C694C1D6.10B73%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; bh=EGMQA+iX8b3A02vmPRMH6fq9mHy6Wfmi252FEFz7qdQ=; b=T6KZPYyFP7vJo+92HAC39PMl4Yi86oysvgRkpg2xNVWl5QS04MzPFebZ GmA3ux9TJ6kJU/DSebGNqazIJYJAYUsQgmGbWWvVrk8GISfzLQZ/epalJ SF1efr6rRoTucNPGAxuIxioBajirEoTt8vvGUC8nhHTrKpgxed3ldDgPy 6X8JLd2jSzEMqKvhweXPu/wsaRyBLtezaV9YZ8sBFN4j6T4ymJHjwepNU mLnJeAXzbrpGQA2ZQBjn197B9dDrC; |
Domainkey-signature: |
s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ezZiaOBnlyianC9ZYVIuGdCT9iwzKRfxbwCIBh2CpJFXiG0qQrDykeb4 aADWF2YH8KF19NEhKTuCcsgwHuwCZrpEnOtAxojpgFcT49+JDphiWu7aa Q7Q4X+BfQiZ4r7cSCITj32cFN92wmhiNSIb8jHLi7GRwN0R1CMkbQz5X2 ik3Y00e2V28iu4VfOsUaEJVMHZJe2Yzm/JYsBakkEzNNW1N1fJXCRB3Th DZSx872jkvn1rUDR+hSvzYtED9cGj; |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C694C1D6.10B73%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Organization: |
Fujitsu Technology Solutions |
References: |
<C694C1D6.10B73%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090707) |
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 28/07/2009 14:41, "George Dunlap" <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> As Juergen says, for people who don't use the feature, it shouldn't
>> have any real effect. The patch is pretty straightforward, except for
>> the "continue_hypercall_on_cpu()" bit.
>
> Just pulled up the patch. Actually cpupool_borrow_cpu() does not seem to
> lock down the cpu-pool-vcpu relationship while continue_hypercall_on_cpu()
> is running. In particular, it is clear that it does nothing if the vcpu is
> already part of the pool that the domain is running in. But then what if the
> cpu is removed from the pool during the borrow_cpu()/return_cpu() critical
> region? It hardly inspires confidence.
I checked the use cases.
All calls leading to cpupool_borrow_cpu() are done under the domctl lock.
The same applies to all cpupool operations.
I can add an explicit check not to unassign borrowed cpus, if you like.
>
> Another thing I noted is that sched_tick_suspend/resume are pointlessly
> changed to take a cpu parameter, which is smp_processor_id(). I swear at the
> screen whenever I see people trying to slip that kind of nonsense in. It
Sorry, this seems to be an artefact of an earlier version of my changes.
I'll remove this one...
> makes it look like the functions can operate on an arbitrary cpu when in
> fact I'll wager they cannot (and I doubt the author of such changes has
> checked). It's a nasty nasty interface change.
I'm pretty sure they could indeed work on any cpu. At least I tried to use
them on other cpus, but I ran into other problems leading to the current
solution not requiring the cpu parameter any more.
Juergen
--
Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems
TSP ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 636 47950
Fujitsu Technolgy Solutions e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Otto-Hahn-Ring 6 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-81739 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion,
Juergen Gross <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Cpu pools discussion, Juergen Gross
|
|
|
|
|