|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
View:-
http://www.fsdaily.com/HighEnd/Disabling_checksum_offloading_at_install_OSOL_2009_06_PV_DomU_on_Xen_3_4_1_Ubuntu_9_04_Dom0
--- On Mon, 7/27/09, Teo En Ming <enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Teo En Ming <enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, July 27, 2009, 5:57 AM
Dear Boris,
My CentOS 4.7 32-bit PV guest is getting the dynamic IP address
assignment from the dnsmasq dhcp server I have setup and configured on Xen
Dom 0 OpenSUSE 11.1 32-bit host correctly.
So I think the issue is OpenSolaris specific.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01 Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original
Message-----
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 01:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's
PVOPS Kernel
Please, submit "brctl show"
Boris.
--- On Mon, 7/27/09, Teo En Ming
<enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Teo En Ming <enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in
Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Monday, July 27, 2009, 12:58 AM
Dear Boris,
I have changed my opensolaris vm configuration. Please see
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_zzjv8MCM2sk/Sm0yIVtghCI/AAAAAAAAAGE/ZGkYbBhhx5w/s1600-h/01.jpeg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_zzjv8MCM2sk/Sm0yIDWV0RI/AAAAAAAAAF8/aP9riPOEZyk/s1600-h/02.jpeg
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_zzjv8MCM2sk/Sm0yHzY3WCI/AAAAAAAAAF0/gFxy7zJZXi8/s1600-h/03.jpeg
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zzjv8MCM2sk/Sm0yHm0RO8I/AAAAAAAAAFs/hIgei-yTbx4/s1600-h/04.jpeg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_zzjv8MCM2sk/Sm0yHcUoQ_I/AAAAAAAAAFk/9AiZKPqmG80/s1600-h/05.jpeg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_zzjv8MCM2sk/Sm0zdXRfyuI/AAAAAAAAAGM/ZqOaIbmTzB8/s1600-h/06.jpeg
I see my OpenSolaris guest sending DHCPDISCOVER and my
OpenSUSE 11.1 32-bit Dom 0 Xen host sending DHCPOFFER but the OpenSolaris
virtual machine is not setting the offered dynamic IP address to it's
virtual NIC.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01 Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:01:54 +0800
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in
Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
|
View:-
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=104509&tstart=75
To switch OSOL DomU run with static IP:-
pfexec svcadm disable network/physical:nwam
&& \
pfexec svcadm enable
network/physical:default
pfexec ifconfig xnf0 down
pfexec ifconfig xnf0 192.168.1.102 netmask
255.255.255.0 mtu 1492
pfexec ifconfig xnf0 up
pfexec route add default 192.168.1.102
which i can/do @ installer time to use static IP
assignements. i just
can't seem to get them to 'stick' or 'be happy'
after reboot and xen,
run-time launch.
Use the same commands with the installed system.
To make the settings permanent you also need
(Jurgen Keil) :
echo 192.168.1.102 netmask 255.255.255.0 mtu 1492
> /etc/hostname.xnf0
rm /etc/dhcp.xnf0
echo 192.168.1.102 > /etc/defaultrouter
Boris.
--- On Sun,
7/26/09, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
< enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
From: Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) <
enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen
Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, July 26, 2009, 5:08 AM
I am
using static IP address.
--
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore
529541
Republic of
Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Does your OpenSuse 11.1
32-bit has static IP address or it obtain it via DHCP ?
If second option is in place please submit
# brctl show
Boris.
--- On
Sat, 7/25/09, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) <enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
At the moment there is only one network card
installed on my lab PC in my company running OpenSUSE 11.1 32-bit with Xen
3.4.1-rc8 Dom 0 kernel 2.6.30-rc6 (jeremy). So when there are more network
cards installed, there will be eth0, eth1, eth2 ethernet bridges, etc.
Then I can assign the virtual network
card in each virtual machine to a specific ethernet network bridge (out of
many bridges) in Domain 0 using the vif command in guest domain
configuration.
--
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore
529541
Republic of
Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
Dear Boris,
The ethernet network bridge on OpenSUSE
11.1 is eth0.
--
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore
529541
Republic of
Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
Boris Derzhavets wrote:
This
means that OSOL installer (by default ) will issue DHCPDISCOVER via your Xen
bridge, looking for DHCP server on your LAN. Only on RHEL 5.3
(F10 with Xen 3.3.1 src.rpm been
installed along with generated packages) with libvirtd & dnsmasq up and
running you can specify
vif=['bridge=virbr0' ] to
detect DHCP Server at your Dom0.
View for instance :-
http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/05/07/backport-zfs-support-to-xen-331-f10-dom0-kernel-2630-rc3-tip/
I don't have any experience with
OpenSuse 11.1 . I hardly remind they tried to reproduce RH's technology.
Most probably they did it in SLES 11 (not sure). Check for
libvirtd&dnsmasq daemons up and running.
But if your OpenSuse 11.1 Dom0 is on
"dhcp" bridge itself , then no problems. Just vif=['bridge=eth0'].
Boris.
--- On Sat, 7/25/09, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
wrote:
From: Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
< enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable to
Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Sander Eikelenboom"
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pasi Kr@xxxxxxxxx,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009, 12:32
PM
Dear
Boris,
This means I have to install a DHCP
server or dnsmasq in my Dom 0, listening on my Dom 0's IP address, so that
it can assign dynamic IP addresses to the DomU.
By the way, are there any
paravirtualized device drivers that I can install in DomU to improve the
performance of the virtual machine?
Thank you.
--
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore
529541
Republic of
Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
Boris Derzhavets wrote:
|
>I
noticed under the guest domain configuration there is a parameter called
>'extra' kernel parameter. Does the 'nowin' argument stand for no
>graphical windows?
Login as jack/jack to text
console.
Wait until :-
$ pfexec ifconfig -a
will show up your IPv4 address
$ mkdir .vnc
$ cp .Xclients .vnc/xstartup
$ vncserver
Connect via vncviewer IP-DomU:1
from another terminal session to OSOL DomU. In case OSOL installer will fail
to obtain IP via DHCPDISCOVER,
let me know. It might happen
and requires Solaris Kernel Model Debugger
to disable checksum offloading
at boot up. Seems to be hardware dependent issue for OSOL 2009.06
**********************************
Copy ramdisk and kernel to Dom0
**********************************
[root@ServerXen isos]# cat copy.sh
mount -o loop,ro osol-0906-x86.iso /mnt
cp /mnt/boot/amd64/x86.microroot /home/boris/solaris
cp /mnt/platform/i86xpv/kernel/amd64/unix /home/boris/solaris
***********************
Installation profile:-
***********************
[root@ServerXen solaris]# cat osol200906.install
name = "sol0906"
vcpus = 1
memory = "1024"
kernel = "/home/boris/solaris/unix"
ramdisk = "/home/boris/solaris/x86.microroot"
extra = "/platform/i86xpv/kernel/amd64/unix - nowin -B
install_media=cdrom"
disk = ['phy:/dev/loop0,xvdc:cdrom,r','phy:/dev/sdb5,xvda,w']
# Would work as well
# disk = ['phy:/dev/loop0,6:cdrom,r','phy:/dev/sdb5,0,w']
vif =
['bridge=eth1']
Boris
--- On Sat, 7/25/09, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
< enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
wrote:
From: Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang
Enming) < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Unable
to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To: enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: "Sander Eikelenboom"
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Boris Derzhavets"
<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pasi_K=E4r?=@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2009,
7:14 AM
--
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore
529541
Republic of
Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
Teo En Ming wrote:
As a matter of fact, our servers are either Dell PowerEdge 1950/2950 and IBM
xSeries.
I am just testing it out on our lab PC first.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone
: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: "Teo En Ming" <
enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
To: "Boris Derzhavets"
<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009
02:27:02 +0800
Subject: Re: Re[8]:
[Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
My next step will be a 64-bit Xen Dom 0 host.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01
Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone
:
+65-9648-9798
MSN:
teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Boris Derzhavets
<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Pasi Kärkkäinen
<pasik@xxxxxx>, enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009
10:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Re[8]:
[Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
|
Teo, it is up to you how to manage, if you just having fun.
Otherwise,
downloading 64-bit OpenSuse 11.1 ISO image
takes just 12-14 hr
even at slow ADSL speed ( like 100 KB/sec).
Install takes 30
minutes and brings you to the trusted results, instead
of wasting a lot of
time in case of business environment assignment.
Pasi has 32-bit
experience due to hardware limitations, which you don't
have.
Boris.
--- On Fri, 7/24/09, Teo En Ming < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
wrote:
From: Teo En Ming
< enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: Re: Re[8]:
[Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To: "Boris
Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>, "Pasi Kärkkäinen"
<pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Sander
Eikelenboom" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday, July
24, 2009, 12:56 PM
My colleague installed OpenSUSE 11.1 32-bit on the Core 2 Duo
machine in our labs. Please see my earlier replies in the same topic.
I was too lazy to reformat and install 64-bit OpenSUSE, so I
proceeded with Xen Dom 0 pvops kernel compilation on 32-bit Linux host.
I admit I am getting a lot of headache. Haha.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics Engineering)
BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online
Pte Ltd
Tampines Central
1 #04-01 Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone
:
+65-9648-9798
MSN:
teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Boris
Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: Sander
Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jul
2009 09:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re:
Re[8]: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
|
Once again, i don't see any reason to to run 32-bit OS on
Core2Duo,
unless you
like Xen head ache. Core development (PVOPS) is obviously
running in
64-bit environment.
Boris.
--- On
Fri, 7/24/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
From: Boris
Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re:
Re[8]: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's PVOPS Kernel
To:
enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx , "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: "Sander
Eikelenboom" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Friday,
July 24, 2009, 12:47 PM
|
>After doing the
above, I re-installed back the Xen hypervisor, libraries and tools, and also
>the kernel, initrd, and modules. Then I proceeded to reboot my machine.
After rebooting, > my CentOS 4.7 32-bit PV guest is still able to start
and run!
Why it
wouldn't ? If your image stays the same.
> I am still very puzzled! What causes the
PV guest initially cannot start? Then what >subsequently causes the PV
guest to suddenly be able to start and run???
That is
not supposed to happen. I would suggest clean OS (without any built in xen
presence) install , followed by Xen 3.4.1+pvops kernel clean install.
Boris.
--- On
Fri, 7/24/09, Teo En Ming < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
wrote:
From:
Teo En Ming < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Subject: Re: Re[8]: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's
PVOPS Kernel
To:
"Teo En Ming" < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >, "Pasi Kärkkäinen"
<pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc:
"Sander Eikelenboom" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:
Friday, July 24, 2009, 12:19 PM
I am very puzzled. In investigating the cause
of the sudden success of the CentOS 4.7 32-bit PV guest being able to run, I
have uninstalled virt-manager and all of its dependencies:
Then I proceeded to "make uninstall" in
xen-3.4-testing source tree, which also removed my self compiled Xen Dom 0
pvops enabled kernel, initrd and kernel modules.
After doing the above, I re-installed back the
Xen hypervisor, libraries and tools, and also the kernel, initrd, and
modules. Then I proceeded to reboot my machine. After rebooting, my CentOS
4.7 32-bit PV guest is still able to start and run!
I am still very puzzled! What causes the PV
guest initially cannot start? Then what subsequently causes the PV guest to
suddenly be able to start and run???
Anyway my CentOS 4.7 guest domain is now
running. I shall now proceed to virtualize OpenSolaris 2009.06.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics
Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01 Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original
Message-----
From: "Teo En Ming" < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
To:
"Teo En Ming" < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >, "Pasi Kärkkäinen"
<pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc:
Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:54:26 +0800
Subject: Re: Re[8]: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's
PVOPS Kernel
It's very strange. Suddenly my CentOS 4.7
32-bit PV guest is able to start!!! Previously it refuses to start at all.
I think I must have changed something in Dom 0
when I attempted "yast --install virt-manager". This action might have
solved the problem. When I tried to install virt-manager, it also tries to
install xen-libs-3.3.1 and xen-tools-3.3.1 as dependencies. However, I
started off my Xen Dom 0 pvops kernel install with Xen 3.4.1 rc8 branch.
I need to investigate more why suddenly my
CentOS 4.7 32-bit PV guest is able to start.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics
Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01 Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original
Message-----
From: "Teo En Ming" < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
To: "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx>
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:54:00 +0800
Subject: Re: Re[8]: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's
PVOPS Kernel
I realized that Fedora 10 32-bit anaconda
installer does not install PAE kernel after mounting the guest disk image
file. I mounted the guest disk image file using losetup and kpartx which
adds device nodes to /dev/mapper. I examined the /boot directory after
mounting the guest disk image file and found no PAE vmlinuz and initrd.
Still using the mounted Fedora 10 32-bit guest
disk image file, I changed root to the guest disk filesystems and attempted
to install the PAE kernel. Then I modified menu.lst to boot the PAE kernel.
After modifying the grub configuration of the guest domain, I un-mounted the
guest filesystem.
I proceeded to boot the F10 32-bit guest, since
I changed to PAE kernel. It is able to boot now (since the PAE kernel is
xen-aware) but then it complains cannot mount /dev/root. Probably something
to do with the PAE initrd file.
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics
Engineering) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical Engineering)
Technical Support Engineer
Information Technology Department
Asiasoft Online Pte Ltd
Tampines Central 1 #04-01 Tampines Plaza
Singapore 529541
Republic of Singapore
Mobile Phone: +65-9648-9798
MSN: teoenming@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original
Message-----
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
To: Teo En Ming < enming.teo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:31:19 +0300
Subject: Re: Re[8]: [Xen-devel] Unable to Configure Xen Dom 0 in Jeremy's
PVOPS Kernel
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 08:37:09PM +0800, Teo En Ming wrote:
> Hi
>
> I attempted to install Fedora 10 32-bit PV guest using
> images/pxeboot/vmlinuz-PAE and images/pxeboot/initrd-PAE.img from
the F10
> media. The non-PAE kernel could not load the installer. I finished
my Fedora
> 10 32-bit PV guest installation but it also cannot boot up after
> installation, same as the CentOS 4.7 PV guest installation.
>
Fedora 10 installer has a bug, as a default it installs non-PAE kernel
for
xen domU. You need to use a kickstart script (like this) to fix it:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/f10-xen-domu-ks.cfg
The important lines being:
-kernel
kernel-PAE
(Fedora 10 and Fedora 11 default kernels are compiled with pv_ops Xen
domU
support enabled, so there's no need for separate kernel-xen with these
distros).
Fedora 11 doesn't have that installer bug, so it installs right
out-of-the-box as Xen domU.
What's the error you get when you start the guest after installation?
Please paste the "xm log" as text.
I don't have any problems with CentOS 5.3 dom0.
-- Pasi
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
-----Inline
Attachment Follows-----
|
-----Inline
Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
-----Inline Attachment
Follows-----
No virus found in this
outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus
Database: 270.13.29/2260 - Release Date: 07/25/09 01:48:00
-----Inline Attachment
Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
No virus found in this outgoing
message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database:
270.13.29/2260 - Release Date: 07/25/09 01:48:00
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG -
www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.30/2262 - Release Date: 07/25/09
18:01:00
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database:
270.13.30/2262 - Release Date: 07/25/09 18:01:00
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database:
270.13.30/2262 - Release Date: 07/25/09 18:01:00
|
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.13.24/2255 -
Release Date: 07/22/09 18:00:00
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
Home