Hi Daniel, i've tested your kernel with slight modifications to your .config (-> domU only) on 64bit 3.2.1 and 3.3 as guest kernel. Compared to the classic 2.6.18.8 the guests are consuming about 25% more CPU, network IO increased by about 15%, disk IO also. Memory footprint is about 10% less. Maybe there are better caching strategies built into this 2.6.29. I'd like to try this as a dom0 kernel, but i'm currently out of spare dom0's ;) cheers, Stephan > i have created a distclean tarball from > > http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list > > with these patches: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/patches-2.6.29-6.htm > > this results in xenified vanilla 2.6.29.3 with some ext4 patches. > > You can get it here: > http://x17.eu/linux-2.6.29-xen-r4-aka-suse-xenified-2.6.29-62.1.tar.gz > http://x17.eu/linux-2.6.29-xen-r4-aka-suse-xenified-2.6.29- > 62.1.tar.gz.md5 > > following my working .config: > http://x17.eu/linux-2.6.29-xen-r4-aka-suse-xenified-2.6.29- > 62.1.config.tar.gz > http://x17.eu/linux-2.6.29-xen-r4-aka-suse-xenified-2.6.29- > 62.1.config.tar.gz.md5 > > untar and be happy :) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users