| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?
|
To: |
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? |
|
From: |
Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 16:56:37 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, okir@xxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 19 May 2009 08:57:32 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<20090520002955R.fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<20090518084052.GD10687@xxxxxxx> <20090519142626X.fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090519130300.GB6238@xxxxxxx> <20090520002955R.fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 00:30 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>
> We need these hooks but as I wrote above, they are
> architecture-specific and we should handle them with the architecture
> abstraction (as we handle similar problems) however we can't due to
> dom0 support.
I don't understand this. What exactly about the dom0 support patch
prevents future abstraction here?
The dom0 hooks would simply move into the per-arch abstractions as
appropriate, wouldn't they?
Ian.
--
Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Mondo Generator - Simple Exploding Man
"We are on the verge: Today our program proved Fermat's next-to-last theorem."
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ingo Molnar
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ingo Molnar
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ingo Molnar
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?,
Ian Campbell <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell
- [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches?, Ian Campbell
- Message not available
- [Xen-devel] Re: swiotlb: remove __weak hooks in favour of architecture-specific functions, Ian Campbell
|
|
|
| |
|
Home