|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Where do we stand with the Xen patches? 
| 
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
 
for-ingo/xen/dom0/pci
for-ingo/xen/dom0/swiotlb
    Updated with Joerg Roedel, FUJITA Tomonori and Matthew Wilcox's
    comments,  Acked-by and Reviewed-bys as appropriate.
 
The original code added dom0-specific dma mapping stuff in the generic
place, which is completely wrong. I asked you to move the hacky stuff
to Xen-specific code and ack'ed the patchset.
But as I said again and again, the dom0 changes to the generic dma
mapipng code is really ugly and I don't like them at all. I didn't
ack'ed such changes.
 
I didn't mean to imply that you all acked all the patches.  I tried to 
be careful to add Acked tags to the actual patches you each respectively 
acked. 
   J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 |  | 
  
    |  |  |