On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:23:20PM +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
> Thu, 14 May 2009 14:59:30 +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> >Hi Kanno-san,
> >
> >Ok, understood.
> >
> >Have you checked your patch against the case where the vslot is not
> >specified? I wonder if you might need a little bit of extra logic for that
> >case.
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I have tried it. The default virtual slot number (0x20) is shown.
> Should not virtual slot numbers be shown in the case?
Hi Kanno-san,
I don't think that it is good to expect that the user will know
that 0x20 means unasigned. Furthermore, it might be nice to
be able to change that magic value in the future. I suggest either:
1) Not showing the vSlot in this case or;
2) Showing something like the string "unassigned"
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home