Thu, 14 May 2009 13:40:04 +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
>On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:41:11AM +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
>Content-Description: Mail message body
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found a problem of xm pci-list. In inactive managed domains,
>> I cannot confirm virtual slot numbers of PCI devices by using
>> xm pci-list as follows. In fact, I can confirm virtual slot
>> numbers of PCI devices by using xm pci-list if active domains.
>
>Hi Kanno-san,
>
>I'm a bit dubious about using requested_vslot if vslot isn't
>present, because as the name suggests, its just a request,
>that may fail. However, I do conceede that it is probably the
>best option available if you are not happy with the
>vslot not being reported in this case. Is there really a need
>for the slot to be reported in this case?
Hi Simon,
Yes, I think that the virtual slot is necessary in the case.
When I add a definition of a PCI device to an inactive managed domain by
using xm pci-attach, I'd like to know current PCI device configuration
of the domain. (e.g. I'd like to know free virtual slot numbers or used
virtual slot numbers.)
Best regards,
Kan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|