WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Impact of P/C-states on server power with xen-unstable

To: 'Niraj Tolia' <ntolia@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Impact of P/C-states on server power with xen-unstable
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:40:04 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:41:22 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7e45e2ac0902101824n489976b1j7f17080b2f0f9bb6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7e45e2ac0902101824n489976b1j7f17080b2f0f9bb6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcmL8A9OC44M90/VRNa7/NLiVZ69SQAAcbIw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Impact of P/C-states on server power with xen-unstable
Hi, Niraj
    C1, i.e 'hlt', is always enabled regardless of cpuidle cmdline option which is about other states deeper than C1. In your box, only C0 and C1 are available as reported and thus it's reasonable for you to observe no difference here. Try other box with more C-states available. :-)
 
Thanks,
Kevin


From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Niraj Tolia
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 10:24 AM
To: xen-devel
Subject: [Xen-devel] Impact of P/C-states on server power with xen-unstable

Hi,

So, I was playing with C-states (with and without cpuidle on the xen command line) on Intel Xeons and I discovered that turning C-state support on/off makes no difference in terms of the power used by an idle server.

The processor in question is a Xeon X5355 and, when cpuidle is enabled, xenpm reports a C1 state and will show that the server is ~99.96% resident in C1 when idle. However, the power consumed by a idle server in C1 is virtually identical to that consumed by the server when C-state support is disabled and the idle server is in either P1 or even P0 (both set manually using the userspace governor and xenpm set-scaling-speed). Is the processor doing something that is not exposed to Xen/xenpm? For what it's worth, the power used by the server does show a significant difference between 100% busy CPUs at P0 and P1.

The relevant 'xm dmesg' output for the first core is included below. I am running xen-unstable changeset 19104/31983c30c460.

Cheers,
Niraj


(XEN) cpu0 cx acpi info:
(XEN)     count = 1
(XEN)     flags: bm_cntl[0], bm_chk[0], has_cst[0],
(XEN)            pwr_setup_done[1], bm_rld_set[0]
(XEN)     states[0]:
(XEN)         reg.space_id = 0x0
(XEN)         reg.bit_width = 0x0
(XEN)         reg.bit_offset = 0x0
(XEN)         reg.access_size = 0x0
(XEN)         reg.address = 0x0
(XEN)         type    = 1
(XEN)         latency = 0
(XEN)         power   = 0
(XEN)         dp(@0x00000000)
(XEN) ==cpu0==
(XEN) active state:        C-1
(XEN) max_cstate:        C7
(XEN) states:
(XEN)     C1:    type[C1] latency[000] usage[00000000] duration[0]
(XEN)     C0:    usage[00000000] duration[5708043748]
(XEN) xen_pminfo: @acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init,SYSTEM IO addr space
(XEN) CPU 0 initialization completed

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>