|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Impact of P/C-states on server power with xen-unstable
Hi,
So, I was playing with C-states (with and without cpuidle on the xen command line) on Intel Xeons and I discovered that turning C-state support on/off makes no difference in terms of the power used by an idle server.
The processor in question is a Xeon X5355 and, when cpuidle is enabled, xenpm reports a C1 state and will show that the server is ~99.96% resident in C1 when idle. However, the power consumed by a idle server in C1 is virtually identical to that consumed by the server when C-state support is disabled and the idle server is in either P1 or even P0 (both set manually using the userspace governor and xenpm set-scaling-speed). Is the processor doing something that is not exposed to Xen/xenpm? For what it's worth, the power used by the server does show a significant difference between 100% busy CPUs at P0 and P1.
The relevant 'xm dmesg' output for the first core is included below. I am running xen-unstable changeset 19104/31983c30c460.
Cheers, Niraj
(XEN) cpu0 cx acpi info: (XEN) count = 1
(XEN) flags: bm_cntl[0], bm_chk[0], has_cst[0], (XEN) pwr_setup_done[1], bm_rld_set[0] (XEN) states[0]: (XEN) reg.space_id = 0x0 (XEN) reg.bit_width = 0x0 (XEN) reg.bit_offset = 0x0
(XEN) reg.access_size = 0x0 (XEN) reg.address = 0x0 (XEN) type = 1 (XEN) latency = 0 (XEN) power = 0 (XEN) dp(@0x00000000) (XEN) ==cpu0== (XEN) active state: C-1
(XEN) max_cstate: C7 (XEN) states: (XEN) C1: type[C1] latency[000] usage[00000000] duration[0] (XEN) C0: usage[00000000] duration[5708043748] (XEN) xen_pminfo: @acpi_cpufreq_cpu_init,SYSTEM IO addr space
(XEN) CPU 0 initialization completed
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Impact of P/C-states on server power with xen-unstable,
Niraj Tolia <=
|
|
|
|
|