xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part
On 16/01/2009 11:01, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But only in spinlocks that I 'own' completely right? I'm more concerned
> about spinlocks that I share with Windows (eg in NDIS).
So only some critical sections will be pv'ed? Then the best you can
currently do is yield-on-spin in your custom spin_lock().
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Juergen Gross
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Juergen Gross
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Venefax
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Juergen Gross
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Steve Prochniak
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 2 of 2]: PV-domain SMP performance Linux-part, Keir Fraser
|
|
|