|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b
On 06/01/2009 18:29, "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I don't understand the reason for this last assignment on 32b systems, since
> xen isn't really using this low memory for its heap.
It's not used for domheap either. In fact it's not really used at all. Hence
encompassing it within xenheap_phys_start to xenheap_phys_end works okay.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Cihula, Joseph
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen_phys_start for 32b, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] RE: Xenheap disappearance: (was: xen_phys_start for 32b), Dan Magenheimer
|
|
|
|
|