|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration
On 18/11/08 09:35, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Keir,
> As my test, video mem and vlapic page are okay, but share page is
> still treated as ram.
>
> After going through the source code, I think this should be "no harm".
> Although xc_domain_restore populate a new share page first, PV driver
> in HVM guest will remap share page when resume, thus destroying
> previous mapping and releasing previous page.
>
> So we want to use this simple patch, or mark the share page "not ram"?
It's fine. The shared page mapping is not set up until after normal guest
memory is restored. So it's safe.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Zhai, Edwin
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Zhai, Edwin
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration, Zhai, Edwin
- Re: [Xen-devel] several Qs about domain live migration,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|