| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] One question on alloc_bitmap
Keir Fraser <mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 18/9/08 16:16, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I have a question to the alloc_bitmap. Currently it is allocated in
>> init_page_allocator() and is continous physical memory mapped in direct map
>> (1:1 map) range. Would it be possible to support un-continous like what's
>> done for frame table? Several reason I can think out that can be improved
>> is: a) if memory sparsed arranged, like large hole in the memory, it may
>> cost some memory b) if we want to support memory hot add, we can't
>> increase this bitmap. c) this map is not NUMA aware, I'm not sure if it
>> has any performance impact, although it is not accessed frequently.
>>
>> Any idea on it?
>
> Yes, it could be sparsely allocated in future. No reason why not.
Thanks for your clarification. We ask this because we are considering memory
online.
Yunhong Jiang
>
> -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home