| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] One question on alloc_bitmap
On 18/9/08 16:16, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I have a question to the alloc_bitmap. Currently it is allocated in
> init_page_allocator() and is continous physical memory mapped in direct map
> (1:1 map) range. Would it be possible to support un-continous like what's done
> for frame table?
> Several reason I can think out that can be improved is: a) if memory sparsed
> arranged, like large hole in the memory, it may cost some memory b) if we want
> to support memory hot add, we can't increase this bitmap. c) this map is not
> NUMA aware, I'm not sure if it has any performance impact, although it is not
> accessed frequently.
>
> Any idea on it?
Yes, it could be sparsely allocated in future. No reason why not.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home