xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Gianluca Guida
<gianluca.guida@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Or, it could be a fixup table bug, but I doubt it.
>
> George, did you saw excessive fixup faults in the trace?
No, nothing excessive; 273,480 over 30 seconds isn't that bad. The
main thing was that out of 15024 attempts to remove writable mappings,
13775 had to fall back to a brute-force search.
Looking at the trace, I can't really tell why there should be a
problem... I'm seeing tons of circumstances where there should only be
one writable mapping, but it falls back to brute-force search anyway.
Here's an example:
24.999159660 -x vmexit exit_reason EXCEPTION_NMI eip 2b105dcee330
24.999159660 -x wrmap-bf gfn 7453c
24.999159660 -x fixup va 2b105f000000 gl1e 800000005caf0067 flags
(60c)-gp-Pw------
24.999748980 -x vmentry
[...]
24.999759577 -x vmexit exit_reason EXCEPTION_NMI eip ffffffff8022a3b0
24.999759577 -x fixup:unsync va ffff88007453c008 gl1e 7453c067 flags
(c000c)-gp------ua-
24.999762562 -x vmentry
[...]
25.002946338 -x vmexit exit_reason CR_ACCESS eip ffffffff80491a63
25.002946338 -x wrmap-bf gfn 7e18c
25.002946338 -x oos resync full gfn 7e18c
25.002946338 -x wrmap-bf gfn 7453c
25.002946338 -x oos resync full gfn 7453c
25.003526640 -x vmentry
Here we see gfn 7453c:
* promoted to be a shadow (the big 'P' in the flag string); at the
vmentry, there should be no writable mappings.
* marked out-of-sync (one writable mapping, with fixup table)
* re-sync'ed because of a CR write, and a brute-force search.
Note that the times behind the "wrmap-bf" and "oos resync full" are
not valid; but the whole vmexit->vmentry arc takes over 1.5
milliseconds.
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Todd Deshane
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Todd Deshane
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Todd Deshane
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), John Levon
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench),
George Dunlap <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
RE: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Daniel Magenheimer
Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Pasi Kärkkäinen
[Xen-devel] Re: Poor performance on HVM (kernbench), Todd Deshane
|
|
|