WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)

To: "Daniel Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Poor performance on HVM (kernbench)
From: "Todd Deshane" <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:48:15 -0400
Cc: xen-devel mailing list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 19:48:38 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GsthVylM/SZMJPQUnYTV3f64nB3r+7bi/F1BpqH+bKY=; b=mSRWYvPsLf9v2vCDe07DKAl35ARDQUFiaQyffqnzxOPodALEE3aeEr1bMdmTSdE9bk W5K4KJLoPQ1ZXli8xVkvIrHjncBm8yqknee87ml9hz7o6/+Tp7nlyDShmrp9PvMHBUvQ dB8weJA+3hLd17/hNrjrGKL60DMlRtHKLNQgs=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=QZflA8Z6Xm+m6MnfyHlaPtwWR7iDHGy+t6tlPH0Tkexep48wxNVX0fQ0H+tjLI1M1S 13Mz73NbjX/dGr9bnDwGktECXs1cPgSJReO0zJneka97JmyPbXol08Cn9pjVOFldFxy0 IEq9SSao40Tnebwlwa3ogTam3CoJ8GwzYuSLk=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e02bd373-d0f2-49db-bf86-17371ee123eb@default>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1e16a9ed0809101442q225c5fcfj25c0b4ffe0da83a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e02bd373-d0f2-49db-bf86-17371ee123eb@default>
Reply-to: deshantm@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Daniel Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps you should run the native with nosmp then, to ensure
> the comparison isn't taken out of context.
>

Dom0, nosmp

Average Optimal load -j 4 Run (std deviation):
Elapsed Time 428.058 (0.18431)
User Time 371.648 (0.86358)
System Time 56.346 (0.989181)
Percent CPU 99 (0)
Context Switches 29144.6 (52.3479)
Sleeps 36239.8 (441.198)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel