[Xen-devel] Re: VT-d scalability issue

To:	"Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: VT-d scalability issue
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 08:03:37 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:03:34 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20080910000914.GC6764@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AckTE1ivl2BSun8GEd22MwAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic:	VT-d scalability issue
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122

On 10/9/08 01:09, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> (b) presumably your upcoming (and existing current?) processors support
>> wbinvd exiting anyway?
> 
> Yes, but exist system has such problem.

Is any significant number of people really using VT-d yet? I must say I'm
skeptical as to whether the existing hardware base really matters all that
much.

 -- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore -- read UUID, Tej

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Dom0: Fix a compile error in pciback_enable_msix(), Han, Weidong

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: VT-d scalability issue, Zhai, Edwin

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: VT-d scalability issue, Ian Pratt

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: VT-d scalability issue