Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 25/8/08 15:15, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Another idea:  Do the initial merge in hw/, and later on, after the
>> qemu-xen tree catched up, move all xen (and xen emulation) bits to
>> another directory.  That would keep the scm revision history intact for
>> the Xen guys.
>> 
>> I also think we need to organize the source -- especially the header
>> files -- a bit better if we start to separate the code into more
>> subdirectories.  And I'd prefer to have some agreement on how the source
>> tree should look like before starting to shuffle around files, so I have
>> to do it only once ...
>>   
> 
> Let's focus on merging and then once it's merged, we can reorganize
> files.  I still haven't seen any comments from the Xen guys wrt this
> patch series.  Has there been discussion on xen-devel that I missed?

With regard to this Xenner patch series, I don't think we have a strong
opinion. The changes are not particularly relevant to us. As long as the
orthogonal qemu-on-xen modes that we *do* care about can coexist happily
alongside, we'll be happy.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel