|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: alternative patch fixing pt_chk_bar_overl
> Ah, yes. I did try to apply it but it didn't quite apply cleanly.
>
> If it's important then we need to clean this up.
The reason why the patch can not be applied to ioemu-remote is
"pci_config_passthrough_with_msi_msix.patch" I submitted has not been
applied to ioemu-remote yet.
I've created new patch for ioemu-remote. If you apply it to ioemu-remote,
the implementation of passthrough device will become almost the same for
both ioemu trees.
The patch contains following patches which have been applied to Xen
Unstable Changeset 17959-18076.
pci_config_passthrough_with_msi_msix.patch
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support more Capability Structures (including
MSI/MSI-X) and Device Specific Registers for pt device.
Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:26:52 +0900
fix_pt_iomap.patch
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Support more Capability Structures
(including MSI/MSI-X) and Device Specific Registers for pt device.
NISHIGUCHI Naoki <nisiguti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:14:55 +0900
fix_pt_bar_mapping.patch
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: pass-through: pt_bar_mapping fix
NISHIGUCHI Naoki <nisiguti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:46:15 +0900
fix_hot-remove.patch
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix issues when passthrough device is
hot-removed from HVM domain
Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:20:11 +0900
chk_bar_overlap_bugfix.patch
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: alternative patch fixing pt_chk_bar_overlap
Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:05:11 +0900
Thanks
Signed-off-by: Yuji Shimada <shimada-yxb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Yuji Shimada
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:54:14 +0100
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jean Guyader writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] ioemu: alternative patch fixing
> pt_chk_bar_overlap"):
> > This code was parted of the FLR patch, I don't think this patch has been
> > merged with the ioemu-remote.
>
> Ah, yes. I did try to apply it but it didn't quite apply cleanly.
>
> If it's important then we need to clean this up.
>
> Since people have started submitting patches to qemu (aka
> ioemu-remote) separately from xen-unstable, and similar things are
> getting committed to both, it's not really practical now for me to do
> a bulk merge from xen-unstable.
>
> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
pci_config_passthrough_ioemu-remote.patch
Description: Text Data
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|