|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] stric
On 4/7/08 20:32, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well one suspicion I had was that very long hpet reads were
> getting serialized, but I tried clocksource=acpi and
> clocksource=pit and get similar skew range results.
> In fact pit shows a max of >17000 vs hpet and acpi closer
> to 11000. (OTOH, I suppose it IS possible that this is
> roughly how long it takes to read each of these platform
> timers.)
That ought to be easy to check. I would expect that the PIT, for example,
could take a couple of microseconds to access.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time),
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time), Keir Fraser
- Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time)), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time)), Keir Fraser
- RE: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time)), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time)), Keir Fraser
- RE: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time)), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel]RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasinghvm guest time)), Ian Pratt
- RE: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel]RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasinghvm guest time)), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: Xen system skew MUCH worse than tsc skew (was RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] record max stime skew (was RE: [PATCH] strictly increasing hvm guest time)), Dan Magenheimer
|
|
|
|
|