|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm
 
On 3/7/08 10:11, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  1. Push your INPROGRESS logic inside of hvm_do_IRQ_dpci() (you'll have to
> create new flag in place of using IRQ_INPROGRESS, obviously). Have
> hvm_do_IRQ_dpci() return one of three statuses: not handled, handled, and
> already pending. Don't bother clearing the flag in the hvm eoi function.
> It's not really a requirement for this scheme to work.
Errm, actually it *is* a requirement to clear the flag in the eoi function.
That's the whole point of how you'll detect spurious interrupts delivered to
HVM guests. Ignore my ridiculous last sentence above. :-)
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Keir Fraser
 
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm,
Keir Fraser <=
 
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
 - [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Keir Fraser
 - [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
 - RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
 - RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Ian Campbell
 
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |