|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm
On 3/7/08 09:10, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought that there already was storm-avoidance logic included, because of
> the other storm scenario you used to be able to reproduce?
Oh, actually, do you mean that this is still the same storm you could repro
before? And we do not have avoidance logic yet because you stopped being
able to repro the issue for a while?
Okay if so, but still I think there are some issues to deal with in the
patch. The avoidance logic for MSI delivery to a PV guest looks suspicious,
as I said in my previous email -- can the patch actually avoid storm
delivery to a PV guest?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Handle MSI irq storm, Shan, Haitao
|
|
|
|
|