RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allow ballooningdow

>>> "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 29.04.08 20:35 >>>
>I made some actual measurements of the results of this algorithm
>(on a RHEL5u1-32bit guest).
>
>memory=        Minimum
>128             75776kB
>256            108544kB
>512            173056kB
>1024           238592kB
>
>This corresponds to expected values in the source comment
>However, I wonder if the algorithm is probably too
>conservative for large(r) memory domains.  With
>a light load (i.e. continuously compiling Xen),
>memory utilization rarely exceeds 72MB, regardless
>of the max memory (at least in the above tested values).

Sure, this was (in different wording) also stated in the comment
that came with the patch. A more precise estimate would certainly
be welcome, but I'm afraid is going to come with a much higher
(complexity) price tag. Unless you have something simple and
obvious in mind that we simply didn't spot...

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Add cpu idle pwr mgmt to xen, Wei, Gang

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Add MSI support to XEN, Shan, Haitao

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] linux/balloon: don't allow ballooningdown a domain below a reasonable limit, Dan Magenheimer

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Grant tables, Carlo Bertoldi

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]