|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN
To: |
"Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx>, Neil Turton <nturton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:31:34 +0100 |
Cc: |
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:33:43 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<823A93EED437D048963A3697DB0E35DE013E2D9A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AciU0oBZmWeHZsxDQgSmv3Rj5p+TNAAr79cQAAEZ0uU= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Add MSI support to XEN |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 3/4/08 13:11, "Shan, Haitao" <haitao.shan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for trying the patches. The problem is caused by incompatibility
> between Xen and Dom0 kernel.
> Pci_vector_resources is to calculate available vectors. Xen assigns vector by
> start with vector 0x20 and offset = 0. This will confuse the code in
> pci_vector_resources.
> Maybe we should replace the function with a hypercall to acquire the number of
> available vectors.
> How do you think about it, Keir?
I may not understand the issue here, but in principle I do not particularly
want to have anything outside Xen handling real IRQ vectors. In which case
this confusion should not exist in the first place? I know the last round of
patches did have dom0 poking the MSI registers, and hence it knew about real
vectors, but that's being changed in the next round, right?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|