Re: [Xen-devel][PATCH][RFC] Supporting Enlightened Windows 2008 Server

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Personally I think the approach is ugly, and also you have not yet presented
evidence that supporting the Viridian paravirtualisations improves
performance. If it doesn't then it's a waste of time; if it does then it
raises the question of which hypercalls provide the benefit, and do we get a
smaller neater patch by supporting just those? One final comment is that the
TLB management code that this slaps on top of the core hypervisor looks a
bit scary to me. Tim Deegan may care to comment more on that.

 -- Keir

On 5/3/08 22:15, "Ky Srinivasan" <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I am attaching updated versions of the patches that I posted a couple of weeks
> ago. These  have been merged up to the current unstable tip: changeset
> 17186:854b0704962b
> 
> These patches have been tested on the unstable tip.
> 
> Kier, what are your thoughts on accepting these patches.
> 
> Signed-off by K. Y. Srinivasan (ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> K. Y 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel