|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/
On 28/1/08 14:02, "Bill Burns" <bburns@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, some progress. Background is that 3.1.2 (and 3.1.3 at least
> as it was a wek or two ago) fails to boot on a 64 CPU es7000 with
> over 112GB of memory. This is with both HV & dom0 being x86_64.
> The symptom is that the dom0 kernel gets time went backwards
> error during init.
>
> The patch at which this first fails is 15137, which is the patch
> that introduces using the ACPI PM timer as the clock
> source. If I include the next patch (that allows for clock
> selection) and choose pit as clock source the system boots
> fine. Without the arg the ACPI timer is used and I get the hang.
The obvious question then is what happens to the ACPI PM timer when dom0
gets more than 112GB of memory. Perhaps it's worth adding some tracing to
Xen and see whether e.g., the platform timer stops running?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- RE: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb usingunstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Carb, Brian A
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb usingunstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- RE: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gbusingunstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
|
|
|
|
|