|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/
Bill Burns wrote:
> Bill Burns wrote:
>> Ian Pratt wrote:
>>>>>> No, I have not tried on 3.2.0. Will see if I can at some
>>>>>> point...
>>>>> Also, do you have any more info to share on what actually goes wrong
>>>> when
>>>>> dom0 has 'too much' memory?
>>>>>
>>>> The dom0 kernel spits out messages like the following starting around
>>>> the
>>>> init of cpu1 time, and periodically thereafter.
>>>>
>>>> Timer ISR/0: Time went backwards: delta=-50206266948
>>> delta_cpu=13733052
>>>> shadow=8186343367 off=13649733458 processed=72042343367
>>>> cpu_processed=21822343367
>>>>
>>>> Eventually just hanging (or making such slow progress to be
>>>> effectively hung).
>>> How many CPUs does the system have? Does the same large memory issue
>>> occur if you have fewer physical CPUs?
>>>
>> The system has 64 but is only built for 32, so the others are
>> ignored. Don't know if the problem happens with less CPUs at
>> this point. Hope to get more data soon...
>>
>
> Interestingly, the symptom seems to disappear with a
> Hypervisor built to support all 64 CPUs. But I need to
> get more time on the system to say that for sure.
>
Disregard the previous. It still happens. Continuing to debug..
Bill
> Bill
>
>
>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Carb, Brian A
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstable c/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- RE: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate,
Bill Burns <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb usingunstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Carb, Brian A
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb usingunstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- RE: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gbusingunstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Test results on Unisys ES7000 64x 256gb using unstablec/s 16693 on 3.2.0 Release Candidate, Bill Burns
|
|
|
|
|