WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] pass-through PCI device hotplug support

To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][HVM] pass-through PCI device hotplug support
From: "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:31:34 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:32:21 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080124180656.GC2400@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080123155208.GA21201@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080124180656.GC2400@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 06:06:56PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > 
> > "xm dpci-remove" hot remove the specified vtd device by the ID, like:
> > xm dpci-remove EdwinHVMDomainVtd 0
> > 
> > "xm dpci-insert" hot add a new vtd device, like '03:00.0':
> > xm dpci-insert EdwinHVMDomainVtd 3 0 0
> 
> IMHO we shouldn't have a 'd' on the front of the command names. VT-d is a 
> vendor specific implementation whose nomenculture doesn't need to be exposed

'd' means directly assigned device, which is generic including VT-d and other 
pass-through device..

Anyway, it's not so important.

> to users. In addition the existing block & network hotplug commands use
> 'attach' and 'detach' for their command names. So for sake of consistency
> I'd recommend command names of:
> 
>   pci-list
>   pci-attach
>   pci-detach

I had the same idea at the beginning, but change mind due to some concerns:

xxx-attach/detach are used for _PV_ driver, but dpci is not the case.
If pci PV driver support hotplug in future, we get a complicated code path to 
handle both PV and dpci's hotplug.

So do we have plan to support PCI PV driver hotplug? If no, we can use 
pci-attach/detach.

> 
> I think it is useful to use the same unique naming & data for both attach and
> detach operations. So if we use a (bus,slot,func) triple for attachment, I
> think we should use the same (bus,slot,func) triple for detachment too,
> rather than having to make apps / users lookup the dynamically-allocated
> 'ID' value for the device.

yes, dynamical ID is not easily for use.
How about using some fixed 'ID' for hot remove, just like vbd/vnif(they also 
use 
different naming&data for attach/detach)?


> 
> Regards,
> Dan.
> -- 
> |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston.  +1 978 392 2496 -=|
> |=-           Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/              -=|
> |=-               Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/               -=|
> |=-  GnuPG: 7D3B9505   F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505  -=| 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 

-- 
best rgds,
edwin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel