xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissuefixe
To: |
"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissuefixed |
From: |
"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:29:31 +0800 |
Delivery-date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:30:01 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5D0214DE09@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<FE7BBCFBB500984A9A7922EBC95F516EB5115E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><C39C22B6.119BD%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <B30DA1341B0CFA4893EF8A36B40B5C5D0214DE09@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AchJ5a0ABwiD6NTlQNGSyGhDP9LHmgAFlCQ5AAhcWeAABhYfcwAoIsagAAAwAcA= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissuefixed |
I saw 32bit Vista guest becomes very slow after a save/restore if using default
timer_mode 0, but timer_mode 2 is OK.
-Xin
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Li, Xin B
>Sent: 2007年12月30日 19:23
>To: Keir Fraser; Cui, Dexuan; You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0:
>#372 -oneissuefixed
>
>will timer_mode impact guest performance after a save/restore?
>-Xin
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Keir Fraser
>>Sent: 2007年12月30日 0:14
>>To: Cui, Dexuan; You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0:
>>#372 -oneissue fixed
>>
>>Not really. I'd perhaps get Xen to dump information about all
>>hvm_params and
>>acceleration options and see if anythign has been dropped across the
>>save/restore.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>>On 29/12/07 13:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On my host, for KernelBuild test, it may vary from 3% to
>10%, but 30%
>>> was also observed on others' hosts.
>>>
>>> Any suggestion?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -- Dexuan
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>Keir Fraser
>>> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 5:20 PM
>>> To: You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 &
>Xen0: #372 -
>>> oneissue fixed
>>>
>>> On 29/12/07 06:40, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 6) HVM domain performance would downgrade, after doing
>save/restore.
>>>
>>> How much does it downgrade by?
>>>
>>> -- Keir
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Xen-devel mailing list
>>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|