|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissue fix
To: |
"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx>, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissue fixed |
From: |
"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:23:26 +0800 |
Delivery-date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:23:55 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C39C22B6.119BD%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<FE7BBCFBB500984A9A7922EBC95F516EB5115E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C39C22B6.119BD%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AchJ5a0ABwiD6NTlQNGSyGhDP9LHmgAFlCQ5AAhcWeAABhYfcwAoIsag |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -oneissue fixed |
will timer_mode impact guest performance after a save/restore?
-Xin
>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
>Sent: 2007年12月30日 0:14
>To: Cui, Dexuan; You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0:
>#372 -oneissue fixed
>
>Not really. I'd perhaps get Xen to dump information about all
>hvm_params and
>acceleration options and see if anythign has been dropped across the
>save/restore.
>
> -- Keir
>
>On 29/12/07 13:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On my host, for KernelBuild test, it may vary from 3% to 10%, but 30%
>> was also observed on others' hosts.
>>
>> Any suggestion?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -- Dexuan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Keir Fraser
>> Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 5:20 PM
>> To: You, Yongkang; xen-devel
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen:#16673 & Xen0: #372 -
>> oneissue fixed
>>
>> On 29/12/07 06:40, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> 6) HVM domain performance would downgrade, after doing save/restore.
>>
>> How much does it downgrade by?
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|