|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] x86_emulate(): forgot to generate_exception_if() for 0xf
Why do you think that? Grp4 only defines valid opcodes for reg==000b and
001b. Grp5 defines valid opcodes for all except reg=111b. So the current
code seems correct.
-- Keir
On 19/12/07 09:34, "Liu, Eric E" <eric.e.liu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
> In arch/x86/x86_emulate.c: x86_emulate():
> 1716 case 0xfe: /* Grp4 */
> 1717 generate_exception_if((m odrm_reg & 7) >= 2, EXC_UD);
> 1718 case 0xff: /* Grp5 */
> 1719 switch ( modrm_reg & 7 )
> 1720 {
> 1721 case 0: /* inc */
> 1722 emulate_1op("inc", dst, _regs.eflags);
> 1723 break;
> 1724 case 1: /* dec */
> 1725 emulate_1op("dec", dst, _regs.eflags);
> 1726 break;
>
> Here we only check 0xfe for "reg >= 2"? I think we should also check
> 0xff -- we should swap line 1717 and 1718?
>
> Thanks!
> --Eric (Liu, Feng)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|