| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.
|
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24 |
|
From: |
Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:03:35 -0800 |
|
Cc: |
xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stable Kernel <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:27:08 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<473B4132.5030402@xxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<20071015204840.074767068@xxxxxxxx> <20071015215406.GA1588@xxxxxxxxx> <4713E2D6.90801@xxxxxxxx> <20071113232258.GA10338@xxxxxxxxx> <473B4132.5030402@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:40:50AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > These don't apply now due to the x86 merge. Care to backport them and
> > send them to the stable@xxxxxxxxxx address so we can apply them
> > properly?
>
> I'm a bit confused. The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386.
> Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is?
Was this second series a new set, or a different one? I was assuming
they were new patches, and that they too needed to be applied.
These patches were sent against the merged x86 tree, not the -stable
tree with i386.
> > Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on
> > 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it.
> >
>
> To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the
> released 2.6.23 kernel. But it isn't screamingly urgent.
Ok, that's fine, but can you send some patches that I can apply? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home