WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.

To: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:40:50 -0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stable Kernel <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:41:33 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20071113232258.GA10338@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20071015204840.074767068@xxxxxxxx> <20071015215406.GA1588@xxxxxxxxx> <4713E2D6.90801@xxxxxxxx> <20071113232258.GA10338@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
Greg KH wrote:
> These don't apply now due to the x86 merge.  Care to backport them and
> send them to the stable@xxxxxxxxxx address so we can apply them
> properly?

I'm a bit confused.  The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386. 
Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is?

> Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on
> 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it.
>   

To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the
released 2.6.23 kernel.  But it isn't screamingly urgent.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel