|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings |
From: |
dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:28:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Cc: |
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Morten Bøgeskov <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:46:00 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<471C1A61.1010001@xxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<470FA7C3.90404@xxxxxxxx> <20071014225618.GN23367404@xxxxxxx> <4712A254.4090604@xxxxxxxx> <200710151415.07248.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <471C1A61.1010001@xxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive
> >> because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs.
> >>
> >
> > why is that? ignoring 32-bit archs we have heaps of address space
> > available... couldn't the kernel just burn address space and delay global
> > TLB invalidate by some relatively long time (say 1 second)?
> >
>
> Yes, that's precisely the problem. xfs does delay the unmap, leaving
> stray mappings, which upsets Xen.
sounds like a bug in xen to me :)
-dean
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings,
dean gaudet <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Nick Piggin
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, David Chinner
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
- [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, David Chinner
|
|
|
|
|