|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings 
| To: | dean gaudet <dean@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings |  
| From: | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:34:57 -0700 |  
| Cc: | Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Morten , David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>,	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Bøgeskov <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx,	Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:35:34 -0700 |  
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| In-reply-to: | <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |  
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |  
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |  
| References: | <470FA7C3.90404@xxxxxxxx> <20071014225618.GN23367404@xxxxxxx>	<4712A254.4090604@xxxxxxxx>	<200710151415.07248.nickpiggin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710212015430.2320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) |  
| dean gaudet wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>   
>> Yes, as Dave said, vmap (more specifically: vunmap) is very expensive
>> because it generally has to invalidate TLBs on all CPUs.
>>     
>
> why is that?  ignoring 32-bit archs we have heaps of address space 
> available... couldn't the kernel just burn address space and delay global 
> TLB invalidate by some relatively long time (say 1 second)?
>   
Yes, that's precisely the problem.  xfs does delay the unmap, leaving
stray mappings, which upsets Xen.
    J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, (continued)
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, dean gaudet
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Nick Piggin
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, David Chinner
[Xen-devel] Re: Interaction between Xen and XFS: stray RW mappings, Andi Kleen
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |