 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking?
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking? |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:51:53 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:50:40 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Is there any reason why this notifier is atomic rather than blocking? 2.6.23 has it as a blocking one, and judging from its use this is the right thing to do. Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] using 3.1.1 with 256GB host, 11_create_concurrent_pos of xm-test fails with Cannotallocate memory, Ian Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking?, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] Limit on the number of grant-table mapped pages, wei huang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] xenstore notifier: atomic or blocking?, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
